Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • RAPID-MIX_API RAPID-MIX_API
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 31
    • Issues 31
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • rapid-mix
  • RAPID-MIX_APIRAPID-MIX_API
  • Issues
  • #5

Closed
Open
Created Feb 15, 2017 by Michael Zbyszyński@MikeZOwner

trainingData: design concerns around phrases and elements

The designed relationship between phrases and elements is not ideal:

  1. Do users of static classifiers need to know about phrases? Should they start recording/stop? Or can they directly add elements? Is one class confusing?

  2. Phrases have string labels and elements have numeric outputs. This lets users create incompatible data sets

  3. Phrases have column_names, elements don't.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking